Remember why declaration was written for us12 min read

Thursday, July 4, marks the 243rd anniversary of signing of the Declaration of Independence. The declaration is an essay in four parts: The preamble, the Declaration of Natural Rights, the List of Grievances and the Resolution of Independence. 

The declaration of natural rights begin: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” 

While we treat the declaration as a public pronounce­ment of our rights and values and the reason for our rebellion, it was not a proclamation to the American people like modern policy speech. Instead, it was a letter addressed from elected leader­ship of the American colonists to their British cousins, not to other Americans. The Declaration of Independence was a tacit declaration of war and the majority of the document was intended to tell their British cousins about the offenses to the 13 Colonies by King George III, prompting a move toward American independence. 

At the time, British citizens and American colonists both had commoners and nobility; the statement was to tell the British that Americans believed all male commoners were equal to lords, counts, marquesses, dukes, kings and knights. While we cite the phrase “… all men are created equal …” in our modern political discourse, we must keep in mind that “all men” as written in 1776 did not include all Americans, nor did it just include all English-born white colonists and their American descendants, but rather all white men over age 21 who owned land. 

There were only 3.9 million people in the United States in 1790 and of those, only about 4% to 6% had full voting rights when the Constitution was ratified. The majority of soldiers who served in the Continental Army did not enjoy the voting rights for which they had fought. However, they did believe that having local control and being able to speak in public assemblies was preferable to being ruled by nobles from oversees. 

Advertisement

We can see these same values of local control over that of a central government when states resist the federal government or cities like Sedona, Camp Verde or Cottonwood resist control from legislators in Phoenix or county supervisors in Prescott or Flagstaff. Kentucky was the first state to repeal the property requirement for white men to vote in 1792. North Carolina was the last of the then-existing states to allow all white men to vote in 1856. Freed slaves and nonwhite men, except American Indians, were not given the right to vote until 1870 under the 15th Amendment, though Jim Crow laws and other voter suppression efforts prevented what “should be” from what was, well into the 20th century. Women didn’t get the vote until the 19th Amendment in 1920, and American Indians were not granted these same full rights of voting and free speech until the Indian Civil Rights Act was passed in 1968. 

While many use the descriptor “Founding Fathers,” this patriarchal term wasn’t coined until Warren G. Harding began using it 1916 in a speech accepting the nomination for president. Before that, they were just called the Signers or the Signatories of the Declaration of Independence and the Framers of the Constitution. Some signers were idealists, many later became offi­cers or generals in the American Revolution but most were regional politicians who drafted the Declaration of Independence.

The purpose of the declaration was to set the foundation for a country the signers hoped future generations would make better. They themselves did so when they saw the Articles of Confederation, which governed the states from 1781 to 1788, was failing and replaced it with the Constitution in 1787. Seeing that such documents would need the means to adapt to changing times, the Constitution’s Article V is specifically included to lay out an amend­ment process. It only took four years for the Constitution to see its first 10 amendments. The bedrock of our most important civil right — free speech — was not even in the original Constitution, but added in 1791 as part of the First Amendment, which also protects newspapers, protests, petitions and separates religion from the state. 

The Signers wrote “all men are created equal” but it’s up to us to bend history toward justice and ensure “all people are created equal and treated equally” under the law. The Framers wrote in the Constitution’s preamble that the document’s purpose was conceived “in order to form a more perfect union.” 

That is not a statement of the Framers’ achievement. It is a directive. It is an entreaty. It calls on us to continue striving to make our still-flawed nation a more perfect union. 

— Christopher Fox Graham 

 Managing Editor

 

The Declaration of Independence
Note: The following text, courtesy of the National Archives, is a transcription of the Stone Engraving of the parchment Declaration of Independence. The document on display in the Rotunda at the National Archives Museum. The spelling and punctuation reflects the original.

In Congress, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

► He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

► He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

► He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

► He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

► He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

► He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

► He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

► He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

► He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

► He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

► He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

► He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

► He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

♦ For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

♦ For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

♦ For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

♦ For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

♦  For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

♦ For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

♦ For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

♦ For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

♦ For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

► He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

► He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

► He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

► He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

► He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

Georgia

Button Gwinnett

Lyman Hall

George Walton

 

North Carolina

William Hooper

Joseph Hewes

John Penn

 

South Carolina

Edward Rutledge

Thomas Heyward, Jr.

Thomas Lynch, Jr.

Arthur Middleton

 

Massachusetts

John Hancock

Maryland

Samuel Chase

William Paca

Thomas Stone

Charles Carroll of Carrollton

 

Virginia

George Wythe

Richard Henry Lee

Thomas Jefferson

Benjamin Harrison

Thomas Nelson, Jr.

Francis Lightfoot Lee

Carter Braxton

 

Pennsylvania

Robert Morris

Benjamin Rush

Benjamin Franklin

John Morton

George Clymer

James Smith

George Taylor

James Wilson

George Ross

Delaware

Caesar Rodney

George Read

Thomas McKean

 

New York

William Floyd

Philip Livingston

Francis Lewis

Lewis Morris

 

New Jersey

Richard Stockton

John Witherspoon

Francis Hopkinson

John Hart

Abraham Clark

 

New Hampshire

Josiah Bartlett

William Whipple

Massachusetts

Samuel Adams

John Adams

Robert Treat Paine

Elbridge Gerry

 

Rhode Island

Stephen Hopkins

William Ellery

 

Connecticut

Roger Sherman

Samuel Huntington

William Williams

Oliver Wolcott

 

New Hampshire

Matthew Thornton

 

Christopher Fox Graham

Christopher Fox Graham is the managing editor of the Sedona Rock Rock News, The Camp Verde Journal and the Cottonwood Journal Extra. Hired by Larson Newspapers as a copy editor in 2004, he became assistant manager editor in October 2009 and managing editor in August 2013. Graham has won awards for editorials, investigative news reporting, headline writing, page design and community service from the Arizona Newspapers Association. Graham has also been a guest contributor in Editor & Publisher magazine and featured in the LA Times, New York Post and San Francisco Chronicle. He lectures on journalism and First Amendment law and is a nationally recognized performance aka slam poet. Retired U.S. Army Col. John Mills, former director of Cybersecurity Policy, Strategy, and International Affairs referred to him as "Mr. Slam Poet."

- Advertisement -
Christopher Fox Graham
Christopher Fox Graham is the managing editor of the Sedona Rock Rock News, The Camp Verde Journal and the Cottonwood Journal Extra. Hired by Larson Newspapers as a copy editor in 2004, he became assistant manager editor in October 2009 and managing editor in August 2013. Graham has won awards for editorials, investigative news reporting, headline writing, page design and community service from the Arizona Newspapers Association. Graham has also been a guest contributor in Editor & Publisher magazine and featured in the LA Times, New York Post and San Francisco Chronicle. He lectures on journalism and First Amendment law and is a nationally recognized performance aka slam poet. Retired U.S. Army Col. John Mills, former director of Cybersecurity Policy, Strategy, and International Affairs referred to him as "Mr. Slam Poet."